George Bush is climate change. The same people who brought to bendless endless wars.
The report was commissioned by influential Pentagon defence adviser Andrew Marshall, who has held considerable sway on US military thinking over the past three decades. He was the man behind a sweeping recent review aimed at transforming the American military under Defence Secretary Donald Rumsfeld.
Climate change ‘should be elevated beyond a scientific debate to a US national security concern’, say the authors, Peter Schwartz, CIA consultant and former head of planning at Royal Dutch/Shell Group, and Doug Randall of the California-based Global Business Network
The average climate scientist or climate change activist probably does not realize his fathers are Republicans! It is like “Luke I am your father”. Actually there were many fathers including eugenicists, population controllers, imperialists, OSS/CIA member including Greg Bateson, technocrats, and elite schools and secret societies like Skull and Bones members and Frankfurt School. Margret Mead and Margret Thatcher were the mothers. But maybe history doesn’t matter? Models are the only thing we should place inside the climate change frame?
I am a historian and alternative energy promoter/inventor. Plus I love being in nature and seeing it preserved. At the same time I like people and think we can all live together. Most environmentalists are good people who want clean water, air and food. Nothing wrong with that. There is another element which subverts the movement and this could hurt it if too much is done too fast. For example if energy and living gets so expensive that under population results. That bringing down the GDP will not hurt societies well being. Also if energy gets scarce and people burn garbage and forests for energy. If alternative energy sources are not found before the limiting policies are in place things could get worse. If better food, housing and sanitation situations don’t drastically improve things could get worse.
Overall carbon dioxide is viewed as a giant lever able to control and re-engineer the climate as well as the society. It is unclear what exactly will happen when politicians start pushing and pulling on it. I doubt the climate will respond since CO2 is the lugnut not the engine of the climate. The society will definetly react although it is unclear how…
Republicans invented climate change. Which Bush said this? The United States is strongly committed to the IPCC process of international cooperation on global climate change. We consider it vital that the community of nations be drawn together in an orderly, disciplined, rational way to review the history of our global environment, to assess the potential for future climate change, and to develop effective programs. The state of the science, the social and economic impacts, and the appropriate strategies all are crucial components to a global resolution. The stakes here are very high; the consequences, very significant. ….or take Margret Thatcher who supported it to crush the unions. Or Vannevar Bush who in Science The Endless Frontier called for the creation of an army of environmental scientists to crush the communists with weather warfare. Www.niflheimmedia.comRecently declassified documents provide evidence that there was a keen appreciation by the Reagan and Bush I administrations of the need to address global environmental challenges, in particular those related to human-driven degradation of the atmosphere and global warming. Despite its overall ideological adherence to small government and free market economics, the Reagan administration did demonstrate significant U.S. leadership in tackling the risks posed by the production and use of ozone-depleting chemicals. Similarly, the George H. W. Bush administration entered office in 1989 with an eye towards building on this leadership to push for international conferences to address a wide range of environmental problems, including climate change. The Bush I administration would back off from this stance, however, in the face of growing business opposition to strong steps to reduce the emission of greenhouse gases, leaving it to the Clinton White House to revitalize U.S. leadership on these issues. http://nsarchive.gwu.edu/NSAEBB/NSAEBB536-Reagan-Bush-Recognized-Need-for-US-Leadership-on-Climate-Change-in-1980s/
Another Republican who supported climate change was Arnold Schwarzenegger.
Eisenhower another Republican furthered climate change science further than any Democratic President. https://niflheimmedia.wordpress.com/2016/04/01/climate-change-science/ Isotope science, ice cores, satelites, computers where would climate science be without its war roots? Mao Lau observatory was a military outpost. The environmental movement and climate science recently turned left or democratic like two forces caused this. LSD via Greg Bateson who social engineered the hippy movement see the first Climate Change movie Circuit Earth and the UN outlawing climate warfare only for peaceful purposes. The environmental movement has another branch and that is the technocrats and Frankfurt school but that is another story. https://niflheimmedia.wordpress.com/2016/10/23/climate-change-a-frankfurt-school-conspiracy-to-destroy-society-good-idea/ Bottom line climate change is a new and improved form of colonialism in Greg Bateson’s own words. It is about engineering society as Agenda 21 and the Club of Rome states. Whether or not the climate models are sound has nothing to do with the policies. For better or worse we will see…
British Genocide, From Thatcher to Gore
by Anton Chaitkin